Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 2592 (PAT)

Arun Kumar Amar and Anr v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./57264/2018 · 2026-06-29

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57264 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2012 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Arun Kumar Amar and Anr S/o Ram Parvesh Rajak, Resident of Vill- Mohiuddin Nagar, P.S.- Mohiuddin Nagar, Dist- Samastipur. 2. Ramesh Prasad, S/o Late Jugal Sah, Resident of Chhatauni Mathia, P.S.- Chhatauni, Dist- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Rupesh Kumar, S/o Late Bihari Rai @ Nand Bihari Rai, Resident of Vill- Bankat Bairiya, P.S.- Motihari Muffasil, Dist- East Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Saran Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 5 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed for quashing the order dated 02.05.2016 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Tr. No. 1206 of 2018 arising out of Motihari Muffasil P.S. Case No. 72 of 2012 registered under Sections 304 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present application may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to take all the points as raised in the petition before Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57264 of 2018(5) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 the learned Trial Court at appropriate stage in accordance with law. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners. 5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, this case stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners, as prayed for. Koustav/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T