Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36837 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2007 Thana- SAMASTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Yatish Narain Son of Late Ram Prasad, Resident of Village- Rajpur Road, Mohalla- Amirganj, Dharmpur, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Bihar State Electricity Board, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Samastipur.
3. Ram Padarath Prasad Singh, Son of Ram Jeevan Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Bhuswar, P.S.- Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur, the then Assistant Electrical Power Supply Division Urban, Samastipur, P.S.- Samastipur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta, APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate : Ms. Preeti, Advocate : Mr. Ravi Kumar Pandey, Advocate : Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 8 30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.
2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed for quashing the order dated 14.09.2017 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, V, Samastipur, in connection with G.R. No. 90 of 2007, Tr. No. 901 of 2017 arising out of Samastipur Town (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.33 of
2007.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36837 of 2018(8) dt.30-06-2026 2/2
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present application may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take all the points, as raised in this petition, before the learned Trial Court at appropriate stage in accordance with law.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State and opposite party no.2 have no objection to this prayer of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, this case stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for.
utkarsh/koustav (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T