Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 2576 (PAT)

VIKASH VERMA @ VIKASH KUMAR VERMA v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./69354/2018 · 2026-06-30

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69354 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-382 Year-2016 Thana- BUXAR District- Buxar ====================================================== Vikash Verma @ Vikash Kumar Verma, S/o Late Jag Narayan Prasad Verma, R/o Village- Devkuli, P.O.- Brahampura, District- Buxar at present residing in house of Kallu Rai, Village- Hanuman Pathak, Namak, Gola Road, Buxar, P.S.- Buxar Town, District-Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Indu Singh, W/o Late Harendra Singh, R/o Village- Sohni Patti, Rajendra Nagar, Ward No. - 33, P.S.- Buxar (Town), District- Buxar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Digvijay Kumar Ojha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed for quashing the order dated 22.03.2017 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in connection with Buxar (T) P.S. Case No. 382 of 2016. 3. As per the report submitted by the learned Trial Court, the Sessions Trial No. 191 of 2024 arising out of Buxar (T) P.S. Case No. 382 of 2016 is pending for argument. 4. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present application may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take all the points, as raised in this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69354 of 2018(3) dt.30-06-2026 2/2 petition, before the learned Trial Court at appropriate stage in accordance with law. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, this case stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for. Koustav/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T