Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 2575 (PAT)

CHATURBHUJ SINGH @ CHUNNU SINGH @ CHATURBHUJ PRASAD SINGH and ORS v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./53559/2018 · 2026-06-29

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53559 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3065 Year-2016 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1. Chaturbhuj Singh @ Chunnu Singh @ Chaturbhuj Prasad Singh S/o Late Devendra Singh 2. Dharmendra Kumar Singh S/o Shri Tej Narayan Singh, 3. Krishna Singh @ Sri Krishna Singh @ Bhatu Singh S/o Late Raghu Singh, All R/o Vill.- Raghopur West All Residents of Vill.- Raghopur West Panchayat, P.S.- Jurawanpur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Dewa Nand Singh S/o Shri Rameshwar Singh, R/o Vill.- Raghopur West Panchayat, P.S.- Jurawanpur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Singh Chouhan, Advocate For the State : Smt. Meena Singh For the Opposite Party : Shravan Kumar, Senior Advocate Krishna Kumar Singh, Advocate Monika Singh, Advocate Muskan Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 6 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed for quashing the order dated 09.05.2018 passed by the learned Sub- Judge 16-cum-A.C.J.M.-15, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Complaint Case No. 3065 of 2016, Tr. No. 3495 of 2017 , whereby and whereunder learned Trial Court took cognizance under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code against Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53559 of 2018(6) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present application may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to take all the points, as raised in this petition, before the learned Trial Court at appropriate stage in accordance with law. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners. 5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, this case stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners, as prayed for. Koustav/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T