LALITA DEVI @ NABITA DEVI @ BABITA KUMARI @ LALITA @LABITA and ANR v. State Of Bihar and Anr
CR. MISC./69337/2018 · 2026-06-30
Sunil Dutta Mishra
body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 2458 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 2458 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69337 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-921 Year-2017 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria ======================================================
1. Lalita Devi @ Nabita Devi @ Babita Kumari @ Lalita @ Labita Wife of Sunil Kumar Sah.
2. Sunil Kumar Sah of Late Band Lal Sah, both Resident of Village-Mia Haat, Chauraprava, Ward No.09, P.S.-Forbesganj, District-Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. State of Bihar.
2. Lalmuni Devi Wife of Prakash Das, Resident of Village-Mia Haat, Chauraprava, Ward No.09, Bhagkohaliya, P.S.-Forbesganj, District-Araria. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Mandal, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 06.09.2018 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge- cum-Special Judge POCSO Act, Araria, District Araria in connection with Special Case No.167 of 2018 arising out of Forbesganj P.S. Case No.921 of 2017 vide G.R. No.3809 of 2017 by which cognizance under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 302, 354, 504 & 506 of the I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act has been taken against the petitioners.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69337 of 2018(3) dt.30-06-2026 2/2
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case has become infructuous, accordingly, he prays that the present Cr. Misc. Application may be disposed of.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners.
5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the present Cr. Misc. Application stands disposed of as it has become infructuous.
Ritik/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T