Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 2426 (PAT)

Rohit Ranjan and Ors v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./17558/2018 · 2026-06-29

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17558 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1153 Year-2017 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1. Rohit Ranjan S/o Shri Jivesh Nandan Prasad, 2. Jivesh Nandan Prasad S/o Late Devendra Prasad, 3. Sudha Prasad D/o Shri Jivesh Nandan Prasad, 4. Sumit Ranjan S/o Shri Jivesh Nandan Prasad, 5. Rupa Shrivastava W/o Shri Sumit Ranjan, All are R/o Mohalla- V.C. Lane, Mithanpura, Ward No.-36, P.O.- Ramna, P.S.- Mithanpura, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Ashok Kumar Verma S/o Late Tara Shankar Prasad Verma, R/o Village P.O.- Damodarpur, P.S.- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Srivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 5 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This petition has been filed for quashing the cognizance order dated 31.01.2018 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, West Muzaffarpur in Complaint Case No. 1153 of 2017, corresponding to Trial No. 4639 of 2017. 3. Vide order dated 19.02.2026, a report regarding present status of case was called for and the same was sent vide Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17558 of 2018(5) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 Letter No. 72 dated 18.03.2026 by the learned Trial Court. As per the said report of the learned Trial Court, it is stated that Complaint Case No. 1153 of 2017 (Trial No. 4639 of 2017) has already been disposed of on 21.04.2018 and the accused persons have been acquitted. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case may be disposed of as it has become infructuous. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner. 6. In view of the submission of learned counsel for the parties, this case stands disposed of as it has become infructuous. utkarsh/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T