Kapil Deo Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors
MJC/2175/2018 · 2026-05-05
Rajiv Roy
Public Interest Litigationbody2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 2345 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 2345 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2175 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12577 of 2010 ====================================================== Kapil Deo Prasad Singh S/o Late Mangar Prasad R/o Vill.- Shiv Nagar, P.O.- Habbipur, P.S. - Parbalpur, Dist.- Nalanda at present C/o Sri Dharambir Kumar Singh, E/29, P.C. Colony, P.S.- Kankarbagh, Dist.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar.
2. Sri R.K. Mahajan, Commissioner-Cum-Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Gov
3. Director Administration-cum- Additional Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. o
4. The Accountant General Bihar,Birchand Patel Path Patna
5. Treasury Officer, Hilsa
6. Treasury Officer, Aurangabad, Bihar
7. Zila Jan Siksha Padadhikari, Aurangabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Janam Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Shilpa Singh - Ga 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 5 05-05-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):
“for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 19.03.2018 passed in CWJC No. 12577 of 2010.”
3. The order dated 19.03.2018 in the writ Court shows
Patna High Court MJC No.2175 of 2018(5) dt.05-05-2026 2/2 that the application was dismissed though with the observation that if the petitioner is entitled for any consequential benefit, it be extended to him.
4. The show cause of the opposite party is on record and it shows that in the Central Bank Account of the petitioner, the pension amount has been transferred.
5. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.
Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U