Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 2285 (PAT)

Mahendra Mandal and Ors v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./65073/2018 · 2026-05-04

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65073 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-338 Year-2018 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== 1. Mahendra Mandal Son of Mungay Mandal, 2. Mukesh Mandal, 3. Sukesh Mandal, Both Sons of Mahendra Mandal, Resident of Village- Karnpur, P.S. and District- Supaul. 4. Pankaj Mandal, Son of Kameshwar Mandal @ Kameshwar Mahto, Resident of Village- Sukhpur, P.S. and District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Rita Devi, Wife of Santosh Sah, Resident of Village- Karnpur, P.S. and District- Supaul. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 04-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This petition has been filed for quashing of the F.I.R. bearing Supaul P.S. Case No. 338 of 2018 registered u/s 448, 323, 379, 354(B), 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Vide order dated 30.03.2026, a report regarding present status of case was called for and the same was sent vide Letter No. 1 dated 15.04.2026 by the learned Trial Court. As per the said report of the learned Trial Court, it is stated that Supaul Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65073 of 2018(3) dt.04-05-2026 2/2 P.S. Case No. 338 of 2018 has already been disposed of on 15.11.2022. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this case may be disposed of as it has become infructuous. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners. 6. In view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, this case stands disposed of as it has become infructuous. utkarsh/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T