IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5180 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17958 of 2014 ====================================================== 1. Kameshwar Sharma and Anr Son of Late Kokai Sharma Resident of Village/Mohalla- Bherdhari, P.S.-Saharsa, District-Saharsa 2. Suresh Prasad Yadav Son of Sri Rameshwar Yadav, Resident of Village- Dumma,P.S.-Bihra, Distrrict-Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through Vyash Ji, Principal Secretary Revenue And Land Reforms Department Govt. Son of Not Known to the Petitioners, Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. Vyash ji Son of not Known to the Petitioner, Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department Govt. of Bihar,, Patna 3. Vinod Singh Gunjaiyal Son of Not Known to the Petitioners, District- Magistrate Cum Collector, Saharsa 4. Ashok Kumar Son of Not Known to the Petitioners, Assistant Director, Employment Unit Saharsa 5. Dhirendra Kumar Jha Son of not Known to the Petitioners, Additional Collector, Sasarsa 6. Subhendu Choudhary Son of Not Known to the Petitioners, District Development Commissioner, Saharsa 7. Smt. Kiran Singh Son of not Known to the Petitioners, Deputy Collector, Establishment, Saharsa 8. Suman Kumar Sah, Son of not Known to the Petitioners, Sub-Divisional Officer, Saharsa 9. Ashok Kumar Singh Son of not Known to the Petitioners, Civil Surgeon Cum Chief Medical Officer, Saharsa 10. Om Prakash Son of not Knwon to the Petitioners, District Education Officer, Saharsa ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 07-05-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the Patna High Court MJC No.5180 of 2018(3) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 following relief(s): “for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 20.12.2016 passed in CWJC No. 10154 of 2014.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order stands complied and as such, the matter has become infructuous. 4. In that background, the present contempt petition stands disposed of. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U