Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 2273 (PAT)

Pramod Singh and Ors v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./67269/2018 · 2026-05-12

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67269 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2016 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1. Pramod Singh Son of Jamindar Singh 2. Puja Devi D/o Pramod Singh 3. Chandan Kumar Son of Pramod Singh 4. Tunni Devi Wife of Pramod Singh All are Resident of Village-Par Nawada Nim Tola,P.S. Bundelkhand O.P. Distt.-Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Guriya Devi D/o Dayanand Prasad Resident of Village-Sakrama,P.S. Asthama,Distt.-Nalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 12-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 07.08.2018 passed by learned S.D.J.M., Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.136 of 2016 by which cognizance under Sections 498(A), 323, 504/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act has been taken against the petitioners. 3. Vide order dated 06.04.2026 a report regarding Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67269 of 2018(3) dt.12-05-2026 2/2 status of case was called for, which was received vide Letter No.25 dated 10.04.2026. As per the said report submitted by the learned Trial Court, the case is pending at the stage of argument. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this case may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to take all the points as raised in the petition, before the learned Trial Court at appropriate stage in accordance with law. 4. Learned APP for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners. 5. In view of the above, the present Cr. Misc. Application is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioners, as prayed for. Ritik/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T