Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59997 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2018 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Pintu Kumar S/o Raj Nandan Pandit, R/o Vill.- Siddhartha Puri Colony, P.S.- Mufassil and District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. State Of Bihar
2. Ranvijay Kumar S/o Mahadeo Prasad, R/o Vill.- Nauranga, P.S.- Muffasil and District- Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2, Advocate Mr. Gajendra Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 5 01-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. This application has been filed for quashing the
order dated 29.05.2018 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Mufassil P.S. Case No.02 of 2018 whereby and whereunder the court concerned took cognizance under Sections 406, 420 and 506 of I.P.C. and Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act against the petitioner.
3. From the status report received from the court concerned, it appears that defence evidence was closed on 25.09.2025 and, therefore, the same was fixed for argument and the record was fixed to conclude defence argument on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59997 of 2018(5) dt.01-05-2026 2/2
23.02.2026.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case may be disposed of as it has now become infructuous.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner.
6. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this application is disposed of as having become infructuous.
Harish/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T