Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.880 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19887 of 2016 ====================================================== Ranjit Kumar, Son of Rajgir Singh, resident of Village- Kalbaliya Bigha, P.S.- Karpi, District- Arwal. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Sri Rahul Ranjan Mahiwal, the Principal Secretary Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. Sri R.K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4. Sri Rajeev Ranjan Sinha, the Director, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
5. Sri Satish Singh, District Magistrate, Arwal.
6. Sri Krishna Singh, The District Education Officer, Arwal.
7. Sri Amrendra Kr. Sinha, The Incharge Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Circle, Patna.
8. Sri Akhilesh Kumar, the Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Arwal.
9. Laxman Prasad, the Executive Engineer, Rural works Department, Works Division, Jehanabad.
10. Bhushan Singh, the Headmaster, High School Mali Ramgarh, District- Arwal. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Aashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 10 07-05-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):
“for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their
Patna High Court MJC No.880 of 2018(10) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 willful disobedience of the order dated 07.07.2017 passed in CWJC No. 19887 of 2016.”
3. A show cause has come on behalf of the opposite party duly signed by the Principal Secretary of the Education Department vide memo no.875 dated 14.05.2018 which shows that the representation of the petitioner stands disposed of.
4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.
vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U