Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 2230 (PAT)

Munga Devi and Ors v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./52994/2018 · 2026-04-07

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52994 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2434 Year-2017 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Munga Devi W/o Bihari and D/o Sri Dwarika Sharma, 2. Dwarika Sharma S/o Late Triveni Sharma, 3. Pawan Kumar Sharma @ Pawan Sharma 4. Ranjeet Sharma, 5. Om Prakash Sharma, 6. Subash Kumar Sharma, 7. Prem Prakash Sharma 8. Binod Kumar Sharma, 9. Raj Kumar Sharma The Petitioners No. 3 to 9 are Sons of Sri Dwarika Sharma, All Residents of Vill.- Sonari Roopnagar Bachcha Singh Basti, P.S.- Sonari, District- Jamshedpur, Jharkhand. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Usha Devi W/o Raj Kumar Sharma and D/o Late Madhusudan Sharma, R/o Vill.- Murthan, P.S.- Sonpur, District- Saran, Chapra. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arun Kumar, APP For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 8 07-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2. 2. This petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 05.02.2018 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Chapra in Enquiry No. 388 of 2018, arising out of Complaint Case No. 2434 of 2017, by which the Court concerned took cognizance u/s 498(A)/ 34, 379/34, 323/34 of I.P.C. against the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52994 of 2018(8) dt.07-04-2026 2/2 petitioners. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this case may be disposed of as it has become infructuous. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 have no objection to this prayer of the petitioners. 5. In view of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, this case stands disposed of as it has become infructuous. utkarsh/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T