VIKAS KUMAR @ BIKASH KUMAR and ANR v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors
CR. MISC./63673/2018 · 2026-03-30
Sunil Dutta Mishra
body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 2148 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 2148 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63673 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2013 Thana- ECONOMIC OFFENCE District- Muzaffarpur ======================================================
1. Vikas Kumar @ Bikash Kumar son of Ramadhar Ram
2. Anita Devi, wife of Ramadhar Ram Both resident of Village- Birsa Nagar, Chhota Bariyarpur, Police Station- Chhatauni, District- East Champaran Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Government Of Bihar, Patna
2. The Inspector General of Police Economic Offence Unit, Bihar, Patna.
3. The Superintendent of Police Economic Offence Unit, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar @ Alok Kr Shahi, Advocate Ms. Komal, Advocate For the State : Smt Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP
For the E.O.U. : Mr. Vishwanath Pd. Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. V.N.P. Sinha, Advocate Mr. Vijay Anand, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 30-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for E.O.U. and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 30.01.2018 passed by the learned Special Judge, Vigilance, North Bihar, Muzaffarpur in Special Case No. 18 of 2013, arising out of Economic Offence P.S. Case No. 22 of 2013 by which cognizance was taken against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63673 of 2018(2) dt.30-03-2026 2/2 1988 and Sections 109 and 120(b) of the I.PC. and further
directed to issue process/summon against the petitioners.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners do not want to press the petition and prays to dispose of the same.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners.
5. Considering the submissions of the learned counsels for the parties, the present case is disposed of.
rakhi/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T