Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 2143 (PAT)

Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

MJC/2986/2018 · 2026-03-10

Rajiv Roy

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2986 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6923 of 2017 ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Son of Late Laxmi Narayan Singh, Resident of Village- Anandbag Karpi, P.O. P.S.-Karpi, District-Arawal. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Collector, Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad, namely Sri Alok Ranjan Ghose. 2. The District Establishment Officer, Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad, namely- Sri Mahfuz Alam. 3. The Circle Officer, Kako, District- Jehanabad, namely- Sri Kishun Dayal Rai. 4. The Circle Officer, Ratni Faridpur, District- Jehanabad, namely - Sri Ashutosh Kumar. 5. The Circle Madhdumpur, District- Jehanabad, namely- Sri Niraj Kumar Jha. 6. The District Account Officer, Jehanabad, namely- Sri Chandan Kumar. 7. The Treasury Officer, Jehanabad namely Sri Chandan Kumar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 10-03-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite parties who have willfully violated the order dated 10.04.2018 passed by the Hon’ble Court in CWJC No. 6923 of 2017.” Patna High Court MJC No.2986 of 2018(3) dt.10-03-2026 2/2 3. The show cause on behalf of the opposite party no.1 to 5 shows that the case of the petitioner was considered and his claim was rejected by the Committee duly headed by the District Magistrate and communicated vide memo no. 529 dated 18.05.2018. 4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, MJC No. 2986 of 2018 is disposed of. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U