Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 2135 (PAT)

Vijay Bahadur Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

MJC/742/2018 · 2026-04-09

Rajiv Roy

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.742 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1805 of 2016 ====================================================== Vijay Bahadur Singh Son of Late Basudeo Singh, Resident of Village and P.O.- Majhariya Industrial Area, Police Station, P.S.- Industrial Thana, District- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Sri Pankaj Kumar, Managing Director, State Food Corporation, Bihar, Patna. 3. Sri Sugandh Chaturvedi, Chief of Finance, State Food Corporation, Bihar, Patna. 4. Sri Uday Pratap Singh, Chief Procurement, State Food Corporation, Bihar, Patna. 5. Sri Kundan Kumar, Chief of Claim, State Food Corporation, Bihar, Patna. 6. Sri Sugandh Chaturvedi, Desk Officer, State Food Corporation, Head Quarter, Patna. 7. Binod Kumar Singh, District Manager, State Food Corporation, Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 9 09-04-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “for initiating contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for intentionally, deliberately and willful violating and disobeying the order dated 03.11.2017 passed in CWJC No. 1805 of 2016.” Patna High Court MJC No.742 of 2018(9) dt.09-04-2026 2/2 3. The Managing Director, State Food Corporation, Bihar, Patna preferred LPA No. 400 of 2022 against the order in question which was disposed of by a Division Bench headed by Hon’ble the Chief Justice on 05.03.2024 with certain modifications. 4. In that background, the Writ Court’s order gets merged with the LPA No. 400 of 2022. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be taking appropriate steps in accordance with law. 6. MJC No. 742 of 2018 stands disposed of. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U