IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.271 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4121 of 2014 ====================================================== Kalyani Devi Wife of Late Kompany Singh, resident of Village- Mamai, P.O.- Mamai, P.S.- Asarganj, District- Munger, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors 2. Mr. Vinay Kumar, The Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar 3. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, The Engineer In Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, 4. Mr. V.K. Srivastava, The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Government 5. Mr. Ajit Kumar, The Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.S. Raza Ahmad, AAG- 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 11 02-04-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for initiation of a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for the wilful dis-obedience shown by the opposite parties to the order dated 11.09.2017, passed in C.W.J.C No 4121/2014 with a direction to the Respondents to consider the case of the Patna High Court MJC No.271 of 2018(11) dt.02-04-2026 2/2 petitioners for their regularization as the case of the petitioners stands on the same footing as that of Manoj Kumar Paswan, who has already been appointed, within three months from the date of receipt / production of their order" but the concerned authority are deliberately not complying this Hon'ble Court's Order intentionally and kindly punish the opposite parties suitably therefore. 3. Mr. Vishwambhar Prasad has taken this Court to the show cause filed by the opposite party to show that the petition stands rejected vide memo no. 677 dated 18.03.2024 by the Executive Engineer, Public Division, Munger. 4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any, the contempt petition is disposed of. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U