Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 2091 (PAT)

Md. Khushhal v. Deepak Kumar

MJC/4918/2018 · 2026-05-06

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4918 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10817 of 2017 ====================================================== 1. Md. Khushhal s/o Md. Abu Bakar Vill.- Falkubari, P.o.- Marghia, P.s.- Barari, Distt.- Katihar 2. Abdul Kuddus S/o Md. Ishaque Vill.- Raj Tola, P.o.- Kabar, P.s.- Barari, Distt.- Katihar 3. Abdul Bashir S/o Habibur Rahman Vill.- Sadartola, P.o.- Marghia, P.s.- Barari, Distt.- Katihar 4. Mafuzzul Hussain S/o Md. Islam Vill.- Hashimpur, P.o.- Hashimpur, P.s.- Barari, Distt.- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Deepak Kumar The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna 2. The State of Bihar through Sri R. K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. Sri Kamal Kumar Sinha the Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. Arsad Firoj the Chairman of Bihar Madarsa Education Board, Patna 5. Md. Jahid Hussain the Secretary Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Patna 6. Dinesh Chandra Dev the District Education Officer, Katihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Anjum Akhter, Advocate For the State : Smt. Shilpa Singh, GA-12 : Ms. Abhanjali, AC to GA-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 06-05-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their Patna High Court MJC No.4918 of 2018(3) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 willful disobedience of the order dated 07.05.2018 passed in CWJC No. 10717 of 2017.” 3. A show cause of the opposite party contains annexure-R2/A according to which vide memo no. 681 dated 01.07.2019, the claim of the petitioner has been rejected. 4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U