Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 2023 (PAT)

Surendra Kumar @ Surendra Kumar Yadav v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./61597/2018 · 2026-04-20

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61597 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2013 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani ====================================================== Surendra Kumar @ Surendra Kumar Yadav S/o Late Subhag Lal Yadav, Resident of Village- Dhanauja, P.S.- Phulparas, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. State Of Bihar 2. Birendra Kumar, S/o Late Subhag Lal Yadav, R/o Village- Dhanauja, P.S.- Phulparas, District- Madhubani. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chandrasen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 20-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 10.08.2018 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Madhubani in Cr. Rev. No. 791 of 2017, 872 of 2017 by which the said revision petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed and further for quashing the order dated 10.07.2017 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Jhanjharpur in G.R. Case No. 311 of 2013, Phulparas P.S. Case No. 49 of 2013, T.R. No. 1966 of 2017 by which petition of the petitioner filed under Section 239 Cr.P.C. was rejected. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61597 of 2018(3) dt.20-04-2026 2/2 case may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take all the points raised in the petition before the Trial Court at the appropriate stage. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the present case is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for. rakhi/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T