Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010047832018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1431/2018 SAYED ALI S/O. LT. MEGHA SK, VILL. MAJER ALGA PART-IV, P.S. FAKIRGANJ, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 13 ORS. REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, RELIEF AND REHABILITATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY. 2:THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DISPUR GHY. 3:THE INDIAN OIL CORPN. LTD. BONGAIGAON REFINERY REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER P.O. DHALIGAON P.S. BONGAIGAON DIST. CHIRRANG ASSAM 4:THE DIRECTOR FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS ASSAM G.S. ROAD BHANGAGHAR GHY. Page No.# 2/4 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 5:THE DIRECTOR CUM CHEMICAL EXAMINER TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DIRECTORATE OF FORENSIC SCIENCE ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY. 6:THE DY. COMMISSIONER DHUBRI P.O. DHUBRI P.S. DHUBRI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 7:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL) BILASIPARA SUB-DIVISION DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 8:THE SUPDT. OF POLICE DHUBRI P.O. DHUBRI P.S. DHUBRI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 9:THE CIRCLE OFFICER BAGRIBARI REVENUE CIRCLE DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 10:THE DY. DIRECTOR FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DHUBRI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 11:THE INSPECTOR OF FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS Page No.# 3/4 BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 12:M/S. PROMOD TRADING COMPANY BIDYAPARA DHUBRI P.O. DHUBRI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 13:M/S. JARUA BANDIHANA S.S. LTD. REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN BILASIPARA SUB-DIVISION DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 14:MD. SANTOSH ALI VILL. PAMERALGA P.O. PAMERALGA P.S. FAKIRGANJ DIST. DHUBRI ASSA Advocate for the petitioner(s): None appears Advocate for the respondent(s): Ms. RR Kakati For respondent No.3 Ms. M Barman, Govt. Advocate, Assam B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 20.07.2026 Page No.# 4/4 None appears on behalf of the petitioner on call. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking certain compensation. The petitioner had expired and this fact was placed before this Court on 19.09.2025. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner thereupon sought for time for taking steps for substitution. However, the substitution has not been carried out and almost 10(ten) months have already expired. 3. Considering the above, in absence of the petitioner being substituted, the present writ petition cannot be proceeded with. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as the present proceedings had abated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant