Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 1823 (GAU)

CHANDAN BOKO v. TAMUR JAMOH

RFA/5/2018 · 2026-04-21

Kardak Ete

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040001842018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : RFA/5/2018 CHANDAN BOKO AGED ABOUT 26 YRS, S/O TACHONG BOKO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE YAGRUNG, PO YAGRUNG, PS PASIGHAT, DIST. EAST SIANG AP. PIN 791102 VERSUS TAMUR JAMOH AGED ABOUT 52 YRS. S/O LT. TANOYING JAMOH, RESIDENT OF VIILLAGE YAGRUNG, PO YAGRUNG, PS PASIGHAT, DIST. EAST SIANG DIST. AP. PIN 79112 Advocate for the Petitioner : B Taipodia, R Bori,M K Boro Advocate for the Respondent : , , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 22-04-2026 None appears for the appellant on call. Although this matter is listed for referral to the Special Mediation Drive, the record reveals that for 3 (three) consecutive occasions the appellant remained unrepresented after 24.04.2025, when learned counsel, Mr. D. Page No.# 2/2 Panging, had sought time to obtain instructions as the appellant had expired. The continuous non-representation indicates that the parties are no longer interested to pursue this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant