Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2018 DAILYLAW 1783 (GAU)

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. SMTI SONALI SAIKIA and 4 ORS,

I.A.(Civil)/1893/2018 · 2026-01-27

Mridul Kumar Kalita

Transfer Petitionbody2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010002582016 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1893/2018 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. A PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKING HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT CHENNAI REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI ASSAM-781005 VERSUS SMTI SONALI SAIKIA and 4 ORS W/O LATE SRI ARUN SAIKIA RO MILANPUR KAMARCHUBURI P.O. and P.S. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM. 2:SARBAN SINGH S/O S. SINGH R/O PA 63 BELGACHIA ROAD KOLKATA WEST BENAGAL C/O LOKNATH BODY BUILDERS SODHAPUR ROAD JUGBESIA N 24 PARGANAS WEST BENGAL 3:BHARAT SARKAR Page No.# 2/3 S/O SRI PRANAB KR. SARKAR R/O RUBBER BAGAN TEZPUR P.S. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. B J MUKHERJEE Advocate for : MR. D KALITA (R-1) appearing for SMTI SONALI SAIKIA and 4 ORS In MACApp. Case No. 473/2018 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 28.01.2026 [1] Heard Ms. L. Sharma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant/insurance company. Also heard Mr. H.J. Tamuli, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R. Baruah, the learned counsel for the claimants/respondents. [2] The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant has submitted that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the instant interlocutory application. [3] Hence, same may be disposed of. [4] The prayer is allowed. [5] This interlocutory application is, accordingly, disposed of on not being pressed. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant