RAFIA MURAD AND ANOTHER v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2018/2026 · 2026-07-15
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 1262 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 1262 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- WP(C) No. 2018/2026
Rafia Murad & Anr.
…..Petitioners
Through: None
vs
UT of J&K & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 15.07.2026
1. The record reveals that the petitioners were directed to place on record their age proof, which till date has not been done. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter further.
2. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 15.07.2026 Sneha
Serial No. 178