ROBINA ANJUM v. MUSHTAQ AHMED CHIEF EDU.OFFICER POONCH
CPSW/423/2018 · 2026-07-08
Rajnesh Oswal
Contempt Petitionbody2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 1252 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 1252 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 423/2018 In SWP No. 311/2018
Robina Anjum
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. S. H. Rather, Advocate.
vs
Mushtaq Ahmed Chief Edu. Officer Poonch .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 08.07.2026
1. In the compliance report filed by the respondent in the month of March 2022, they have placed reliance upon the Govt. Order dated 16.11.2018 to assert that claim of the petitioner was devoid of any merit.
2. Hon’ble the Supreme Court of India, in case titled as Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir and others vs. Saba Wani reported in 2026 INSC 439, has issued slew of directions so far as the appointment of RET Teachers is concerned.
3. The respondents are required to consider the claim of the petitioner in light of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the judgment (supra).
4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to comply with the judgment, which is the subject matter Serial No. 32
2 CPSW No. 423/2018
of the present contempt petition, in light of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 08.07.2026 Sahil Padha
Sahil Padha 2026.07.08 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document