HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No. 498/2018 In SWP No. 472/2011 Bishamber Dass …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. vs BVR Subramanyam Chief Secy. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE ORDER 29.06.2026 1. In terms of order dated 08.12.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner had sought short adjournment in view of the decision taken by the respondent/contemnor in furtherance of the judgment which is subject matter of the present contempt petition. 2. On the previous date of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, none has chosen to appear on behalf of the petitioner, which clearly demonstrates loss of interest on part of the petitioner in pursuing the instant contempt petition. 3. In view of the above, contempt proceedings are closed with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in the event cause survives. (RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE Jammu 29.06.2026 Sahil Padha Serial No. 86 Sahil Padha 2026.06.29 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document