RAVINDER KUMAR v. STATE TH.RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/1388/2018 · 2026-05-08
Sindhu Sharma
body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 1169 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 1169 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 46
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 1388/2018
Ravinder Kumar
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None.
V/s
State of J&K and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER
08.05.2026
1. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last three consecutive dates of hearing, i.e., 27.07.2018, 13.08.2018 and
11.04.2025. Today also, when the matter was taken up for consideration, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
2. It is, thus, evident that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the present writ petition. Accordingly, this instant writ petition is dismissed in default of appearance and for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction(s), if any, shall stand vacated.
(Sindhu Sharma)
Judge
Jammu:
08.05.2026 Michal Sharma/PS