RANDHIR SINGH JAMWAL v. GURMEET SINGH ADJUTANT GENERAL AND ORS
CPSW/435/2018 · 2026-05-08
body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 1154 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 1154 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CJ Court Case: CPSW No. 435/2018 in SWP No. 237/2005
Randhir Singh Jamwal ….. Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs
Gurmeet Singh & Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, Sr. Advocate (DSGI) Mr. Karan Sharma, CGSC.
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (THROUGH VIRTUAL MODE)
ORDER 08.05.2026
1. By means of the present petition, the petitioner seeks initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent-authorities for their willful/deliberate disobedience for not implementing the order dated April 29, 2016, passed in SWP No. 237/2005 (Randhir Singh Jamwal vs. Union of India and ors.).
2. A bare reading of the order referred to above reveals that the petition preferred by the petitioner was disposed of by the Writ Court with a direction to respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for disability pension within a stipulated time period.
3. Learned Senior counsel for the respondents submits that the claim of the petitioner was considered and the disability pension in his favour has since been granted. Therefore, nothing substantive survives in the petition.
4. In wake of the above, the present contempt is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. However, in the event any dispute/cause of action/interest still survives, the petitioner is at liberty to move an appropriate application for revival of the present petition and its decision on merits.
( (ARUN PALLI) CHIEF JUSTICE Jammu 08.05.2026 Sunita
Sr.No. 52 SUNITA KOUL 2026.05.12 13:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document