VED PARKASH AND ORS. v. STATE TH.SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/2239/2018 · 2026-05-08
Sanjeev Kumar
body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 1149 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 1149 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 35 REGULAR LIST
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
(Through Virtual Mode)
SWP 2239/2018 VED PARKASH AND ORS. …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs.
STATE OF JK & ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: None CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE ORDE R 08.05.2026
1. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on last two consecutive dates of hearing. Today also, when the case was called out nobody turned up to appear on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners have lost interest to pursue this petition.
2. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, subsisting shall stand vacated.
(SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 08.05.2026
“MIR ARIF” MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 11.05.26