MUKHTAR AHMED v. STATE OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECY. P.H.E. AND ORS
SWP/2356/2018 · 2026-03-03
Sanjay Dhar
body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 1069 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 1069 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- SWP No.2356/2018
Mukhtar Ahmed …..Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
State & Ors. .….Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER (03.03.2026)
On the last date of hearing, nobody had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, none has appeared on his behalf. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed for non- prosecution.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU
03.03.2026
Sneha
Serial No. 19