APHC010939012018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 45351 of 2018 Bench Sr.No:-254 [3506] Kommineni Chalapathi Rao and others ...Petitioner(s) Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondent(s) ********** Advocate(s) for Petitioner(s): MR. J. M. NAIDU, MR. B VAMSI KRISHNA Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): MR.VIJAYA KUMAR CH, GP FOR REVENUE, GP FOR ENDOWMENTS, MR. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY, MRS. S. PRANATHI CORAM : SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 17th July 2026 ORDER: Present writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: “…to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th and 5th respondents in trying to forward the claims of ineligible persons based on false and fabricated documents even without conducting any enquiry with regard to rights, title, possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the land to an extent of Ac.6-24 cents in Sy.No.27-3 of Dondapadu Revenue Village, Guntur District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents not proceed with submission of claims of the ineligible persons who are not the legal heirs of 1) Late Kommineni Chelamaiah, 2) Late Kommineni Venkataramaiah, 3) Late Kommineni Veeraiah in respect of the land to an extent of Ac.6.24 2 CGR, J. W.P.No.45351 of 2018 cents in Sy.No.27-4 of Dondapadu Revenue Village, Thulluru Mandal, Guntur District, and to pass….” 2. Learned counsels appearing for the petitioners as well as the contesting respondents state that the inter se claims amongst the petitioners, and as well as unofficial respondents have been resolved by way of settlement. A copy of such settlement is placed on record along with a memo, dated 17.11.2025. Both the learned counsels would state that in view of settlement arrived at, respondents 3 and 4 are now supposed to process the claims qua respective parties in terms of G.O.Ms. No.330, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (CRDA.2) Department, dated 11.10.2018, and extend the parties with appropriate benefits thereunder. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments appearing for 21st respondent, states that besides the writ petitioners and third parties, being entitled to respective benefits as mentioned above, even Dharmadhikari is also entitled for appropriate compensation to be decided by respondents 3 and 4. 4. In view of aforesaid submissions and the stand pleaded by writ petitioners as well as unofficial respondents, it would suffice to dispose of the Writ Petition by directing respondents 3 and 4 to consider the claims made by all respective parties and process the 3 CGR, J. W.P.No.45351 of 2018 applications, if any, in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.330, dated 11.10.2018 or other Government Orders otherwise applicable in accordance with law. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any in this case, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN cs