Vedala Padmaja v. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration,
WP/3089/2018 · 2026-06-22
V Sujatha
body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 1045 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 1045 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010067862018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 3089 OF 2018 Between:
1. VEDALA PADMAJA, W/O. LATE K.P.RAGHAVACHARYULU, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. JAGGAIAHPET, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. P.PADMA,, D/O. LAKSHMI NAIK, R/O. JAGGAIAHPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. BONTHA AMARA KUMARI,, W/O. SRIHARI, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O. NEAR MADDUKURI KOTAIAH BHAVAN,
CHINTLATOPU, JAGGAIAHPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. YERRAGORLA RAJYA LAKSHMI,, W/O. BRAHMAM, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O. MADDUKURI KOTAIAH BHAVAN, CHINTLATOPU, JAGGAIAHPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SESHAM SUDHA RANI,, W/O. PRASAD, OCC HOU APSARA THEATRE ROAD, JAGGAIAHPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. MADIRA SAMUEL, S/O. VEERA RAGHAVULU, R/O. JAGGAIAHPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 1. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 3089 OF 2018 VEDALA PADMAJA, W/O. LATE K.P.RAGHAVACHARYULU, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. JAGGAIAHPET, KRISHNA DISTRICT. P.PADMA,, D/O. LAKSHMI NAIK, R/O. JAGGAIAHPETA, KRISHNA BONTHA AMARA KUMARI,, W/O. SRIHARI, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O. MADDUKURI KOTAIAH BHAVAN,
CHINTLATOPU, JAGGAIAHPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. YERRAGORLA RAJYA LAKSHMI,, W/O. BRAHMAM, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O. MADDUKURI KOTAIAH BHAVAN, CHINTLATOPU, JAGGAIAHPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. SESHAM SUDHA RANI,, W/O. PRASAD, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O. APSARA THEATRE ROAD, JAGGAIAHPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. MADIRA SAMUEL, S/O. VEERA RAGHAVULU, R/O. JAGGAIAHPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA VEDALA PADMAJA, W/O. LATE K.P.RAGHAVACHARYULU, AGED 50 P.PADMA,, D/O. LAKSHMI NAIK, R/O. JAGGAIAHPETA, KRISHNA BONTHA AMARA KUMARI,, W/O. SRIHARI, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O. MADDUKURI KOTAIAH BHAVAN,
CHINTLATOPU, YERRAGORLA RAJYA LAKSHMI,, W/O. BRAHMAM, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O. MADDUKURI KOTAIAH BHAVAN, CHINTLATOPU, JAGGAIAHPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. SEHOLD, R/O. APSARA THEATRE ROAD, JAGGAIAHPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. MADIRA SAMUEL, S/O. VEERA RAGHAVULU, R/O. JAGGAIAHPETA, ...PETITIONER(S) THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA
2
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, JAGGAIAHPET, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE JAGGAIAHPET MUNICIPALITY, JAGGAIAHPET, KRISHNA DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER
6. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in dismissing the appeal vide proceedings No. BCW1/94/2017 dated 11.1.2018 confirming the orders No. REV-ESECOLAS(REP)/ 1/ 2017-JA(E3)-KCO, dated 27.5.2017 passed by the 2nd respondent as arbitrary, illegal and consequently set aside the impugned proceedings No. BCW1/94/2017 dated 11.1.2018 passed by the 1st respondent confirming the orders No. REV ESECOLAS(REP)/ 1 /2017-JA(E3)-KCO, dated 27.5.2017 passed by the 2nd respondent in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to disposes the petitioners from their respective land in Sy.No. 536/2 situated in Jaggaiahpet, Krishna District by suspending the impugned orders in file No. REV-ESECOLAS(REP) / 1 / 2017-JA(E3)- KCO, dated 27.5.2017 issued by the 2nd respondent and the consequential proceedings No. BCW1/94/2017 dated 11.1.2018 passed by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP)
3
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities The Court made the following:
4
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 3089 OF 2018 ORDER:-
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.M. Kranthi Gireesh, learned counsel, representing Mr. P. Nagendra Reddy, for the Petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 23.06.2026
KK
5
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 3089 OF 2018
23.06.2026
KK