Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2018 DAILYLAW 1028 (AP)

D.Venkata Ramana Reddy v. STATE OF A.P.

WP/936/2018 · 2026-06-15

V Sujatha

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC011040322017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 936/2018 Between: 1. D.VENKATA RAMANA REDDY, S/O. NARAPA REDDY, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. POTHURUPALLI, TARAMCHARLA PO, RAPUR MANDAL, NELLORE, 2. GUDLURU GIRI BABU, S/O. KRISHNAIAH, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. 23- 1-685, BESIDE REGICHETTU CENTRE, FATHEKHANPET, NELLORE, REPRESENTED BY VALLABHANENI SURESH BABU S/O. V.SUBBA RAO, R/O. ROAD NO. 3, BANJARAHILLS, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE VIDE REGISTERED C.P.A. 289 OF BOOK- 4OF 2016 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF A P, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE 2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE (REGN- I) DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522 414 3. DIRECTOR AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, EDUPUGALLU, KRISHNA DISTRICT 523 4. THE THASILDHAR, RAPUR SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, RAPUR 5. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE 6. THE SUB REGISTRAR, AMMANABROLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 2 VS,J W.P.No.936 of 2018 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to refusal order of the 6th respondent as confirmed by the 5th respondent dated 01-08-2017 in Appeal Petition No. 6 of 2016 and set aside the same as being arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the 6th respondent to register the sale deed in the light of G.O. Rt. No. 1324 Revenue Regn-I Department dtd 15-12-2017 issued by the government, as this honorable court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case IA NO: 1 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of this Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. AMARA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.936 of 2018 ORDER : This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “.... to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to refusal order of the 6th respondent as confirmed by the 5th respondent dated 01.08.2017 in Appeal Petition No.6 of 2016 and set aside the same as being arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the 6th respondent to register the sale deed in the light of G.O.Rt.No.1324 Revenue Regn-I Department dtd 15.12.2017 issued by the government….” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents. 3. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the common order dated 27.03.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.45296 of 2017, 41 and 488 of 2018 and requested to pass a similar order in this Writ Petition also. The same is not disputed by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. The operative portion of the said order, reads as under: “….In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader as well as the Judgment of the composite High Court in Vinjamuri Rajagopalachari’s case, the petitioners are directed to submit fresh application through mee-seva as per the conditions enumerated under G.O.Ms.No.300 Revenue (Assn.I) 4 VS,J W.P.No.936 of 2018 Department, dated 05.07.2016 to the District Collector within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receipt of such applications, the District Collector is hereby directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.” 4. In view of the same, for the reasons alike in the aforesaid order, this Writ Petition is also disposed of, in terms of the common order, dated 27.03.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.45296 of 2017, 41 and 488 of 2018. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. Registry is directed to attach the copy of the common order, dated 27.03.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.45296 of 2017, 41 and 488 of 2018 to this order. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date:16.06.2026 KGR