Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2018 DAILYLAW 1019 (AP)

Kambala Babji, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/46336/2018 · 2026-06-15

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010958872018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 46336/2018 Between: 1. KAMBALA BABJI,, S/O MASENU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O CHINATERNALA VILLAGE, PEDATERNALA POST, NAKKAPALLI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, FOREST DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER, YELAMANCHILI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. SRI NUKAMATA GANGADEVI VANASAMRAKSHANA SAMITI, CHINATEENARLA VILLAGE, NAKKAPALLI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in conducting the elections to the Managing Committee of the 4th respondent Samithi on 27.12.2018 with old and new members and on the strength of ineffective 2 resolution dated 04.12.2017 passed by the general body is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the guidelines framed by the government through G.O.Ms.No.13, dated 12.02.2002 and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to conduct the elections of the Managing Committee to the 4th respondent Samithi with old members of the Samithi and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to conduct the elections of the Managing Committee to the 4th respondent Samithi with old members of the Samithi pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR FORESTS (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 46336 of 2018 ORDER:- When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.V.N.Narayana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter, since the relief has become infructuous. 2. Ms. Baliboyina Sravani, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Forests for the respondents is in attendance. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 16.06.2026. UPS 4 8 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 46336 of 2018 Dt.16.06.2026 UPS