Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2018 DAILYLAW 1014 (AP)

Smt. K. Vijaya, v. Prl.Secy., Muni.Admin.dept., State of A.P.,

WP/16278/2018 · 2026-05-06

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010351772018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 16278/2018 Between: 1. SMT. K. VIJAYA,, W/O K. LAKSHMAIAH NAIDU, HINDU, BUSINESS, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/ O. BHAVANI NAGAR, CHUKKALANIDIGALLU SRIKALAHASTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. A. P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECY MUNI ADMIN DEPT STATE OF A P, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 3. TIRUPATI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, TIRUPATI CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. SRIKALAHASTI MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, SRIKALAHASTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL TAHSIDAR, SRIKALAHASTI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRIKALAHASTEESWARA SWAMY DEVASTANAM, SRIKALAHASTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SRIKALAHASTEESWARA SWAMY DEVASTANAM, SRIKALAHASTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 3. Karri kalyan Durga Prasad SC FOR TUDA The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri P. Niranjan Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A. Chandraiah Naidu, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, submits that learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner has filed a Memo on 04.05.2026 along with a Letter from the Writ Petitioner dated 30.04.2026, seeking to withdraw the present Writ Petition. Letter of the Writ Petitioner dated 30.04.2026 along with Memo dated 04.05.2026 are taken on record. 2. Request granted. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:07.05.2026 Vns