Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2018 DAILYLAW 1005 (AP)

A1 Mansoor Minority Educational and Welfare Society, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/43571/2018 · 2026-04-05

Sumathi Jagadam

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010901922018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 43571/2018 Between: 1. A1 MANSOOR MINORITY EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY,, D.NO.20/348, D.C. ROAD, KADAPA CITY, Y.S.R DISTRICT, REP., BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER, SHAIK FAROOQ AHAMMED, S/O. LATE SHAIK MAHMOOD AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SPL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVT AND CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Y.S.R DISTRICT, KADAPA. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA REVENUE DIVISION KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHASILDAR, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, Y.S.R DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue at appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents No. 2 to 5 it finalizing the alienation proposals initiated through 2 the proceedings in Ref.E1/2193/2017, dated 10-11-2017 for alienation of the Government Land in an extent o Ac.4.95 Cents in Sy.No.720/1 of Utukur Village fields C.K.Dinne Mandal, Y.S.R District in favour of th petitioner on payments of market value as arbitrary anc abduction of the statutory duty cast on them and wel established legal principles apart from being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India anc consequently direct the respondents No.2 to 5 to finalize the alienation proposals initiated through the proceedings Ref. E1/2193/2017, dated 10-11-2017 and alienate the same in favour of the petitioner on payment of the market value forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.2 to 5 to finalize the alienation proposals initiated through the proceedings Ref.E1/2193/2017, dated 10-11-2017 and alienate the same in favour of the petitioner on payment of the market value, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri.Shaik Ameenuddin, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 06.04.2026 rsd 4 12 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 43571/2018 Date: 06.04.2026 rsd