APHC010750252017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 595/2018 Between: 1. P SATYA RAO, R/O. BAPADAPALEM., BHARINIKAM POST., PARAWADA MANDAL, VISAKAPATANAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. P NEELAMMA, R/O. BHARINIKAM VILLAGE AND POST., PARAWADA MANDAL, VISAKAPATANAM 2. MASTER PRAGADA, R/O. BHARINIKAM VILLAGE AND POST., PARAWADA MANDAL, VISAKAPATANAM 3. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,. HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD, ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toset aside the Judgment passed in FC.O.P.No. 139/2007, dated. 08/05/2017 on the file of Judge, Addl. Family Court, Visakapatanam, Visakapatanam District, and allow the above Revision, and to pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 2 To condone delay of 25 days in filing the above Criminal Revision Case and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To suspend the order passed din FC.O.P.No. 139/2007 on the file of Judge., Addl. Family Court, at Visakapatanam., Visakapatanam District, pending disposal of the above criminal revision case and to pass. IA NO: 3 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To condone the delay of 164 days in re-presenting the above Criminal Revision case and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B V RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MSVS SUDHA RANI 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 595/2018 The Court made the following: Smt. Sudha Rani, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2, submits that the matter was settled before the learned court below and there is no necessity to proceed further with this matter. She further submits that the settlement amount has already been deposited by the petitioner with the intervention of well-wishers outside the court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, if the matter has already been settled between the parties, it would not be necessary to proceed further with this matter. Having recorded the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, it appears that there is no legal impediment to dispose of the matter by recording that no further orders are required in the instant Criminal Revision Case. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated:06.04.2026 SSA 4