Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2017 DAILYLAW 985 (AP)

S SYDAMMA, KURNOOL DIST v. E YANKANNA, KURNOOL DIST

CRP/3260/2017 · 2026-06-18

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

Original Suitbody2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010584422017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3260/2017 Between: 1. S SYDAMMA, KURNOOL DIST, W/O. MYRAMUDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, YENUGUBALA VILLAGE, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. E YANKANNA KURNOOL DIST, S/o. E. Minappa, Hindu, aged about 70 years, Agriculturist, Yenugubala Village, Yemmiganur Mandal, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the order and decree dated 02.02.2017 in I.A.NO. 66 of 2015 in O.S.NO. 55 of 2007 On the file of the court of the Junior Civil Judge, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 4285 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 43 days in filing revision against the order and decree dated 02.02.2017 in IA.No. 66 of 2015 in OS.No. 55 of 2007 to meet ends of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKER Counsel for the Respondent: 1. LAKSHMIKANTH REDDY DESAI The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:3260/2017 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order and decree dated 02.02.2017 in I.A.No.66 of 2015 in O.S.No.55 of 2007 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending the Revision Petition, the main Suit itself was decided. As such, no further orders are necessary and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 19.06.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP 4 03 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:3260/2017 19.06.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP