APHC010394322017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2395/2017 Between: 1. MARUBOINA THIRUPALAIAH,, S/O. SRI DESAIAH, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURISTS, R/O CHINNA KATTUVAPALLI VILLAGE, CHILLAKURU MANDAL, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. MARUBOYINA BHASKARAIAH,, S/O SRI DESAIAH, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURISTS, R/O CHINNA KATTUVAPALLI VILLAGE, CHILLAKURU MANDAL, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. SMT. MARUBOINA JALANDHARAMMA,, W/O SRI BHASKARAIAH, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURISTS. R/O CHINNA KATTUVAPALLI VILLAGE, C'HILLAKURU MANDAL, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. (J.DRS/RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3 IN EP.NO.186 OF 2008) ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. CHITTOOR SUGUNAMMA, W/o Rajasekhar, Hindu, aged 45 years, Occ: Agriculturists. R/o Chinna Kattuvapalli Village, Chillakuru Mandal, S.P.S.R. Nellore District. (D.Hr/Petitioner in E.P.No.186 of 2008) ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the Order dated 04.04.2017 passed in E.P.No.186 of 2008 in OS.No.510 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gudur, 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 3132 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order dated 04.04.2017 passed in EP.No. 186 of 2008 in OS.No. 510 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge Court, Gudur, S.P.S.R.Nellore District pending disposal of the CRP and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P PHALGUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2395/2017 ORDER: On perusal of the docket order, it is observed that on the last occasion, this Court directed the learned counsel for the petitioners to file proof of service. But it seems that even today, no proof of service is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Moreover, today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. This indicates that the petitioners are not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter. 2. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 17.06.2026 TTPPSS 4 45 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2395/2017 17.06.2026 TTPPSS