Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010737042017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2344/2017 Between:
1. G.RAJENDRA, S/O YERRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 2. G.RAVINDRA, S/O G.ABBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 3. G.PRATHAP, S/O G.ABBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 4. G.SRIDHAR, S/O G.ABBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 5. G.ANAND,, S/O G.ABBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 6. G. KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O CHINNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
7. G.SATHYAMURTHY, S/O CHINNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. 8. G.RAJASEKHAR, S/O G.LOKARAJA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 9. G.REDDEPPA, S/O G.LOKARAJA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. 10. G.SURENDRA BABU, S/O G.NAGARATHNAM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 11. G.DAMODHARAM,, S/O MALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE RESIDENTS OF BANDLADODDI VILLAGE, KEERAMANDA POST, BANGARUPALYAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. K REDDELOPA, S/O CHANDRACHARI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 2
2. B VENKATACHALAPATHI CHINNA, S/O B.CHENNAKESAVULU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS. 3. C NIRMALA, W/O ANBU, SARPANCH. 4. T SUBRAMANYAM, S/O CHINNASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 5. GOPAL, S/O LATE GURRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. 6. BABU, S/O KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. 7. C REDDEPPA, S/O RAMAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF BANDLA DODDI VILLAGE, KEERAMANDA POST, BANGARUPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. STATE OF A P, REP.BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR. 9. TAHASILDAR, BANGARUPALEM MANDAL. 10. DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, CHITTOOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toaggrieved by the order and decree dated 15.3.2017 passed in I.A.No. 10 of 2017 in O.S.No. 616 of 2016 by the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chittoor, IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 3063 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.No. 616 of 2016 on the file of the Learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chittoor, pending final disposal of the CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
K RAMAMOHAN The Court made the following:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2344/2017 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order and decree dated 15.03.2017 passed in I.A.No.10 of 2017 in O.S.No.616 of 2016 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chittoor. 2. Ms.Swathi, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no cause survives for further adjudication in this Revision petition and the Revision Petition becomes infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 17.06.2026 TTPPSS
4
43 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2344/2017
17.06.2026 TTPPSS