Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2017 DAILYLAW 970 (AP)

G SESHAIAH, GUNTUR DIST v. P RAMACHANDRA RAO, W.GODAVARI DIST & 2 OTHERS

CRP/2744/2017 · 2026-06-16

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

Original Suitbody2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010016962017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2744/2017 Between: 1. G SESHAIAH, GUNTUR DIST, S/O. PULLAIAH. AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. R/O. KANNEGANDLA, H/O. LAGADAPADU, PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL, SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER AND 1. P RAMACHANDRA RAO W GODAVARI DIST 2 OTHERS, S/O. NAGESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O. SOMAVARAPPADU. DONDUKURU MANDAL, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. PEDDINTI SIVA SANKARA RAO, S/O. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O. SOMAVARAPPADU, DONDUKURU MANDAL, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. PEDDINTI NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. BAPANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, C/O. LAKSHMI NARAYANA, R/O. SOMAVARAPPADU, DONDUKURU MANDAL, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. (3RD RESPONDENT NOT NECESSARY PARTY TO THIS REVISION) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toto allow the revision by setting aside the order dated 14.03.2016 passed in I.A.No.625/2003 in O.S.No.161/1998 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli, Guntur District appointing the Advocate 2 Commissioner to measure the Item No.1 of Plaint Schedule Property also and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 3621 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in OS.No. 161/1998 on the file of Principal junior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli, Guntur, pending disposal of the CRP by this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M CHALAPATI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P BHASKAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2744/2017 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the order dated 14.03.2016 passed in I.A.No.625 of 2003 in O.S.No.161 of 1998 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli, Guntur District. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending the Revision Petition, the main suit itself is disposed of. As such, no cause survives for further adjudication in the Revision Petition and the matter becomes infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 17.06.2026 BSP 4 14 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2744/2017 17.06.2026 BSP