APHC010627312017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2657/2017 Between: 1. MUVA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O SRIRAMULU AGED ABOUT: 55 YRS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O D.NO.1-123, MADEPALLI VILLAGE, ELURU MADNAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. PAMIDIMARRI NAGA VENKAT VARA PRASAD, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO AGED 50 YRS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O SOUTHERN STREET, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. MUVVA SRIDEVI, W/O VENKATESWARA RAO AGED 50 YRS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO.1-123, MADEPALLI (V), ELURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT (RESPONDENT NO.2 IS NOT NECESSARY PARTY TO THIS PETITION) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the order dated 27-04-2017 in EP No.98/2016 in OS No.198/2011 on the file of Addl. Senior Civil Judge's Court, Eluru and allow the revision petition with costs and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 3499 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further execution proceeding in EP NO.98/2016 in OS NO.198/2011 2 on the file of Addl. Senior civil Judge's Court, Eluru including arrest of the JDR No.1/Petitioner, pending the civil revision petition in the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K J V N PUNDAREEKAKSHUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2657/2017 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the order and decree dated 27.04.2017 in EP No.98 of 2016 in O.S.No.198 of 2011 on the file of Addl. Senior Civil Judge's Court, Eluru. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending the Revision Petition, the matter was settled. As such, no cause survives for further adjudication in the Revision Petition and the matter becomes infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 17.06.2026 BSP 4 12 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2657/2017 17.06.2026 BSP