APHC010608092017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1733/2017 Between: 1. C.VENKATARAMAN REDDY, CHITTOOR DT.,, S/O VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RETIRED HEAD MASTER, R/OD.NO.9-74, AMARAVATHI NAGAR, TIRUPATHI, CHITOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REP. BY P.P.HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. 2. D MUNIRATHNAM RAJU, S/O KRISHNAMA RAJU,. RMP DOCTOR, GUGGA AGRAHARAM VILLAGE, NAGARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto file this Criminal Revision Case against the judgment and dismissal of the appeal by confirming the orders passed by the District Consumer Forum II Chittoor at Tirupathi by A.P.State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Hyderabad in FA No.711 of 2014, dated 13-3-2017 for the following grounds among other; IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 2770 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the orders in E.A.No.3/2013 in EA.No. 31/2008. 2 IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 2771 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner on bail by suspending the sentence passed by the District Forum, Tirupati in E.A.No.3/2013 and confirmed by the A.P.State Commission, Hyderabad in F.A.No.711/2014 and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1733/2017 The Court made the following ORDER: None appears on behalf of petitioner. 2. At the outset, it appears that the order under challenge before this Court has been passed by the A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Hyderabad in F.A. No. 711 of 2014 arising out of E.A. No. 03 of 2013 in C.C. No. 31 of 2008 on the file of the District Consumer Forum-II, Chittoor at Tirupati. This Court, vide order dated 30.10.2025, directed the Registry to verify whether this Court has jurisdiction to entertain such a Criminal Revision Application. It is reported by the Deputy Registrar of this Court, vide report dated 02.03.2026, that a Criminal Revision Case is not maintainable against an order passed by the Consumer Forum. 3. Taking note of the office report and also considering the fact that the instant Criminal Revision has been filed challenging the order of the A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Hyderabad, and in consonance with the report submitted by the Registry, the instant Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as not maintainable. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated:30.04.2026 SSA