Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2017 DAILYLAW 934 (AP)

Pushpa Juvvigunta v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7993/2017 · 2026-04-22

Battu Devanand

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010703342017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 7993/2017 Between: 1. PUSHPA JUVVIGUNTA, W/O. NARASIMHA RAO, R/O. KONDAMUDI VILLAGE, PONNUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S. PONNUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. YESOBU MEKALA, R/O. KONDAMUDI VILLAGE, PONNUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 5. MEKALA BADA, S/O. YESOBU MEKALA, R/O. KONDAMUDI VILLAGE, PONNUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. BABU KONDURU, R/O. KONDAMUDI VILLAGE, PONNUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. PRAKASH, R/O. KONDAMUDI VILLAGE, PONNUR RURAL, 2 GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 8. SUBBARAO KONDURU, R/O. KONDAMUDI VILLAGE, PONNUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 9. SUDHAKAR KANCHERLA, R/O. KONDAMUDI VILLAGE, PONNUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 10. SUDHA MEKALA, R/O. KONDAMUDI VILLAGE, PONNUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 11. MERSI MEKALA, R/O. KONDAMUDI VILLAGE, PONNUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 12. PRASAD SATHULURI, R/O. KONDAMUDI VILLAGE, PONNUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 in not conducting the investigation and not filing the charge sheet in F.I.R No.172 of 2015 of P.S. Ponnur Rural, Guntur District as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the very provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to conduct the investigation and file the charge sheet in F.I.R No.172 of 2015 of P.S. Ponnur Rural, Guntur District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 9857 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to conduct the investigation and file the charge sheet in F.I.R No.172 of 2015 of P.S. Ponnur Rural, Guntur District, pending disposal of the main writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO.7993 OF 2017 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during pendency of this Writ Petition, nothing survives in this Writ Petition for further adjudication and sought to dismiss the Writ Petition as infructuous. 2. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Dated: 23.04.2026 TM 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 7993 of 2017 Dated: 23.04.2026 TM