APHC010149362017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 480/2017 Between: 1. AKANA DURGA VARA PRASAD,, S/O. SUBBA RAO, AGED 22 YEARS. 2. AKANA MURALI KRISHNA,, S/O. SUBBA RAO, AGED, 19, YEARS. BOTH THE PETITIONERS ARE RIO. H. NO. 17-2-15/96, KRISHNA BABU COLONY, RUSTUMBAK, NARSAPUR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVTI CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARASAPURAM TOWN POLICE STATION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. GOGI NAVEEN KUMAR, S/O. MOHAN KUMAR, AGED 24 YEARS, R/O. PETHALAVARI STREET, 26TH WARD, NARASAPURAN TOWN AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 3rd respondent in registering the case in Crime No. 188 of 2016, dt. 04.11.2016 against the petitioners for the offences punishable Under Sections 324 r/w. 34 IPC and Sections 3 (1) (x) of SC and ST [POA], Act, 1989, as illegal, irregular, 4, irrational, abuse of process of law and violative of provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently quash the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 534 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to order stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioners in Crime No. 188 of 2016, dt. 04.11.2016 on the file of 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. DASARI S V V S V PRASAD The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO.480 OF 2017 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during pendency of this Writ Petition, nothing survives in this Writ Petition for further adjudication and sought to dismiss the Writ Petition as infructuous. 2. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Dated: 23.04.2026 TM THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 480 of 2017 Dated: 23.04.2026 TM