Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2017 DAILYLAW 819 (CHH)

Shiv Kumar Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

WPS/5710/2017 · 2026-01-01

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5710 of 2017 1 – Shiv Kumar Sharma, S/o Late Shri Raruha Prasad Sharma, Age-68 years, Post– Amin/Patwari, R/o. Kantikunj, in front of Shri Ram Health club, Shanti Vihar Colony, Danganiya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District-Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 – The Accountant General, Through the Assistant Account Officer, Office of the Accountant General, General Provident Fund Section, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 – The Divisional Joint Director, Treasury Account and Pension, Near Nagar Ghadi Chowk, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Executive Engineer, Water Resource Division No.1, Raipur (Near Kali Mandir), Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 – Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resource Sub-Division No.3 O.C.M. Chowk, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Digitally signed by DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Date: 2026.01.03 14:14:26 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Shri Alok Kumar Dewangan, Advocate For Respondent / State : Shri Rohitashva Singh, Dy.G.A. ({Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput}) Order on Board 02/01/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed off permitting the petitioner to submit representation before respondent No.3 and respondent No.3 may be directed to consider and decide the same at the earliest within a stipulated period of time. 2. Not opposed by the learned State counsel. 3. Accordingly, this petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to make a representation before respondent No.3 including therein the grievances as raised in this writ petition within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent No.3 shall decide the same in accordance with law within a further period of 120 days. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- ({Sachin Singh Rajput}) JUDGE Deepti