Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2017 DAILYLAW 671 (UTT)

Sukhram v. S.d. Kandwal

SA/112/2017 · 2026-03-20

Siddhartha Sah

body2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS SA No.112 of 2017 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Ashutosh Posti, Advocate for the respondents. On the last date, learned counsel for the appellant has sought time to examine the provisions of Order 43 Rule 1(t) of CPC. Today, Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate for the appellant seeks to withdraw the instant appeal with liberty to file Appeal from Order as per provisions of Order 43 Rule 1(t) of CPC. The instant second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Siddhartha Sah, J.) 20.03.2026 Ravi