Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2017 DAILYLAW 5123 (DEL)

MANJU & ANR v. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR

MAC.APP./1121/2017 · 2026-03-13

Anish Dayal

Review Petitionbody2017

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 1121/2017 MANJU & ANR .....Appellants Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. (through VC) versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. (through VC). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R % 13.03.2026 CM APPL. 69094/2025 (condonation of delay in filing) 1. This application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 1458 days in filing the present Review Petition. 2. In view of the facts and circumstances stated in the application, delay is condoned. 3. Application stands disposed of. REVIEW PET. 42/2022 1. By judgment dated 22nd March 2018, the appeal filed by the claimant and was allowed by this Court and the award amount was enhanced from Rs.8,14,564/- to Rs.13,23,365/- along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. 2. Since recovery rights had been given to Insurance Company against respondent no.3 (owner of the offending vehicle), a Review Petition This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2026 at 13:14:36 No.42/2022 was filed for exonerating the driver/owner for the recovery on the ground that the license of the driver of the offending vehicle had duly been validated and verified. 3. It is stated in the application and asserted by Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate appearing on behalf of applicant/review petitioner, that the driving license, fitness and permit of the vehicle was duly verified. 4. This is agreed to by Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate, who states that Insurance Company employed an Investigator, who had verified the same. 5. Accordingly, the Review Petition is allowed to the extent that the recovery rights against respondent no.3 would not subsist any further. 6. Review Petition stands disposed of. 7. Pending applications are rendered infructuous. 8. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J MARCH 13, 2026/ak/bp This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2026 at 13:14:36