Quintessential Designs India v. State Industries Promotion
WP/7676/2017 · 2026-03-09
Krishnan Ramasamy
Transfer Petitionbody2017
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 4334 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2017 DAILYLAW 4334 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.7676 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.7676 of 2017 and W.M.P.Nos.8398 & 8399 of 2017 Quintessestial Designs India Pvt. Ltd., Status Quo, 5th Floor, No.38, Sterling Road, Nungumbakkam, Chennai – 600 034. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT), Rep. By its Chairman and Managing Director, No.19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Post Box No.7223, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 2.Soorya Food Products, No.AG-31/15, Shanthi Colony Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai – 40. Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the Allotment Order Ref No.P& SP/AP/IRU/SFP/2016 dated 21.06.2016, issued by the 1st respondent to the 2nd respondent and consequential Lease Deed dated 06.10.2016 with Document No.6693/2016 and quash the same and directed the 1st respondent to consider the application dated 02.07.2015 of the petitioner for allotment of Plot K41, “Apparel Park”, SIPCOT Industrial Estate, Irrungatukottai, Sriperumbadur Kanchipuiram District – 602 105 to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.7676 of 2017 For Petitioner(s): M/s.Aishwarya S Nathan For Respondent(s): Mr.Kritheeshwaran For Mr.Abishek Murthy Government Advocate For R1
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the Allotment order dated 21.06.2016, issued by the 1st respondent in favour of the 2nd respondent and to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner’s application dated 02.07.2015 for the allotment of Plot K41, “Apparel Park”, SIPCOT Industrial Estate, Irrungatukottai, Sriperumbadur Kanchipuiram District – 602 105 in favour of the petitioner. 2.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the petitioner made an application on 02.07.2015 for allotment of Plot No.K-41
“Apparel Park”, SIPCOT Industrial Estate, Irrungatukottai, Sriperumbadur Kanchipuiram District – 602 105, in order to expand their present factory premises, the 1st respondent without considering the same has allotted the Plot K-41, vide allotment order dated 21.06.2016 to the 2nd respondent, who is not under the business of apparel manufacture. When this lease is wholly for the readymade garments industries, the 1st respondent has allotted the aforesaid plot to 2nd respondent, whose primary area of business is food and allied products. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.7676 of 2017 3.Learned Government Advocate appearing for the 1st respondent by producing the surrender deed dated 04.12.2019 would submit that the 2nd respondent had surrender the Plot No.K-41 to the 1st respondent and a surrender deed dated 04.12.2019 has been executed between the respondents 1 and 2 in this regard. Therefore, the prayer in this writ petition challenging the allotment
order dated 21.06.2016 has become infructuous. Further the 1st respondent is ready to consider the petitioner’s application dated 02.07.2015, for allotment of Plot No.K-41 “Apparel Park”, SIPCOT Industrial Estate, Irrungatukottai, Sriperumbadur Kanchipuiram District – 602 105. 4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing for the 1st respondent and perused the materials available on records. 5.Considering the submissions made by either parties, it is evident that there are two folds of prayer in this writ petition. As regards the first portion of the prayer since the surrender deed dated 04.12.2019 has been executed between the respondents 1 and 2 to surrender Plot K-41 “Apparel Park”, SIPCOT Industrial Estate, Irrungatukottai, Sriperumbadur Kanchipuiram District – 602 105, the first portion of the prayer has become infructuous. As far the second portion of the prayer is concerned the petitioner seeks to direct the 1st respondent to consider his application dated 02.07.2015, for allotment of Plot https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.7676 of 2017 No.K-41 “Apparel Park”, SIPCOT Industrial Estate, Irrungatukottai, Sriperumbadur Kanchipuiram District – 602 105. Since the aforesaid surrender deed dated 04.12.2019 has been executed between the respondents 1 and 2, there is no impediment for the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner’s application dated 02.07.2015. 6.Such being the case, the 1st respondent is directed to consider the petitioner’s application dated 02.07.2015 for allotment of Plot K-41 “Apparel Park”, SIPCOT Industrial Estate, Irrungatukottai, Sriperumbadur Kanchipuiram District – 602 105 in their favour, after issuing notice to the petitioner, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7.With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 09-03-2026 rst Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.7676 of 2017 To 1.The District Forest Officer, Attur Division, Salem District. 2.The District Collector, Salem District, Salem. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.7676 of 2017 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. rst W.P.No.7676 of 2017
09-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis