IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 154 RAJPAL STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: Present: TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA setting aside/quashing the recovery notice dated checking report/LL and meter joint checking report dated 31.08.2017, memo and notice dated 26.09.2017, Annexures P asking the petitioner to approach compounding fee of 2. trial Court for sam injunction, which was dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 21.03.2022, Annexure P also dismissed by the District Judge, Narnaul 31.05.2022, Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP- Date of decision: Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocate for the respondents. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia setting aside/quashing the recovery notice dated checking report/LL-1 bearing no.2463/47 dated 22.06.2017, Annexure P and meter joint checking report dated 31.08.2017, and notice dated 26.09.2017, Annexures P asking the petitioner to approach compounding officer for depositing the compounding fee of ₹1 lakh. It is not disputed that the petitioner trial Court for same grievance by filing a suit for declaration and permanent injunction, which was dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 21.03.2022, Annexure P-6. The appeal filed against the dismissed by the District Judge, Narnaul 31.05.2022, Annexure P-7. The regular second appeal IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH - 27218-2026 Date of decision: August 26, 2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocate inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari setting aside/quashing the recovery notice dated 05.06.2026, Annexure P-9, 1 bearing no.2463/47 dated 22.06.2017, Annexure P-1, and meter joint checking report dated 31.08.2017, Annexure P-2, as well as and notice dated 26.09.2017, Annexures P-3 and P-4 respectively, compounding officer for depositing the It is not disputed that the petitioner had earlier approached the e grievance by filing a suit for declaration and permanent injunction, which was dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 6. The appeal filed against the said judgment was dismissed by the District Judge, Narnaul, vide judgment dated he regular second appeal preferred thereafter ...Petitioner ...Respondents certiorari 9, , as well as 4 respectively, compounding officer for depositing the earlier approached the e grievance by filing a suit for declaration and permanent injunction, which was dismissed vide judgment and decree dated was dated preferred thereafter JASPREET KAUR 2026.09.02 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP- 27218-2026 -2- was also dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 17.01.2023, Annexure P-8. 3. In this view of the matter, the instant petition cannot be entertained and stands dismissed. August 26, 2026 (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) Jaspreet Kaur JUDGE  Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JASPREET KAUR 2026.09.02 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh