201-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA UMA SINGH AND SIDBI (SMALL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: None Ms. Nidhi Mr. Depender Singh, Advocate for the respondent. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 quashing of case bearing No.138 NI Act/CC/8150 dated 14.06.2017 (Annexure P-4) pending before learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurugram and summoning order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurugram on 18.08.2017 (Annexure P 2. Despite, the case having been called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that neither the petitioners nor their counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition. 3. Under these circumstances, having left present petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution accordingly. January 10, 202 manisha (i) (ii) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS V/S SIDBI (SMALL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR None for the petitioners. Ms. Nidhi Dahia, Advocate for Mr. Depender Singh, Advocate for the respondent. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 quashing of case bearing No.138 NI Act/CC/8150 dated 14.06.2017 (Annexure 4) pending before learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurugram and summoning order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurugram on 18.08.2017 (Annexure P-5). Despite, the case having been called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that neither the petitioners nor their counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition. Under these circumstances, having left present petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution accordingly. 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned (ii) Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20421-2018 Date of decision: 10.01.2025 ...PETITIONERS SIDBI (SMALL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA) ...RESPONDENT HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Depender Singh, Advocate for the respondent. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of case bearing No.138 NI Act/CC/8150 dated 14.06.2017 (Annexure 4) pending before learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurugram and summoning order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurugram on Despite, the case having been called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that neither the petitioners nor their counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition. Under these circumstances, having left with no other option, the present petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution accordingly. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No is for quashing of case bearing No.138 NI Act/CC/8150 dated 14.06.2017 (Annexure 4) pending before learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurugram and summoning order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurugram on Despite, the case having been called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that neither the petitioners with no other option, the MANISHA 2025.01.10 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment